Notes Toward a Report: Question 4
What is unique about a Mormon understanding of Abraham?
An experimental e-seminar in Mormon theology dedicated to carefully examining a handful of primary and secondary texts about Abraham in light of key questions about the nature of fidelity to God, the possibility of theology, the centrality of family relationships, and a uniquely Mormon understanding of Abraham.
4 Comments:
Genesis 16
- what about the connections between Gen 16 and D&C 132? the differences in the account of how/why a second wife is taken?
Genesis 20-21
- in the entire Genesis account of Abraham he is “old”; a uniquely Mormon understanding of Abraham will be an understanding of Abraham as other than “old”?
Genesis 22
- does this double loss of both Ishmael and Isaac connect with Mormon doctrines about the loss and risk inherent in the plan of salvation?
Abraham 1
- the most striking difference between Genesis and Abraham: the shift from an brisk, impersonal, third-person narrative to a detailed and self-conscious first-person narration?
- the shift in narrative style is exemplified in the shift toward explanation for why things are done (some Genesis is very short on)
- this shift is more “Mormon” because explanation and a discussion of priesthood “rights” is more works oriented and intelligible? de-emphasizing the mysterious, unconditional and unaccountable intervention of God?
- what do we do with the “Pharaoh” who is righteous and blessed but denied the priesthood?
Post a Comment
<< Home